Blog

Posted on

Linguistics Learning

 

Lecture series on Introduction to Linguistics. Covers syntax, semantics, morphology, phonetics, and phonology.

ntroduction to Syntax in Linguistics. Covers Generative Grammar, X-Bar Theory, and Movement.

SEM131 – Ambiguity

SEM130 – Ambiguity vs. Vagueness

SEM_021 – Linguistic Micro-Lectures: Structural Ambiguity

 

SYN124 – The Function of the Verb – Mood and Modality

VLC106 – Syntax: Part I

VLC107 – Syntax: Part II

his playlist covers logic used in philosophy, discrete mathematics, computing science, and linguistics. It covers propositional/statement logic, predicate/quantificational logic, modal logic, and others. Topics include translating English into logic, truth tables, truth trees, rules of inference, deductive proofs, digital logic, and much more! This is a playlist in the works, so stay tuned for more!

SEM122 – Predicate Logic I

SEM122 – Predicate Logic II

 

Posted on

library links

legal-prose.org/
legal-prose.org/nav-pages/crim-toc
legal-prose.org/nav-pages/civ-toc
legal-prose.org/nav-pages/crim-toc
0
legal-prose.org/investigations-c2-search
legal-prose.org/adjudication-1
legal-prose.org/../library/adjudication/BOOK-criminal-procedure-adjudicative.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/adjudication/ISPOVERTYIMMUTABLEFORTHECOUNTYJUDGE-10-27-2021.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/crimlaw/BOOK-CRIMINAL-LAW-CASES-MATERIALS-KAPLAN.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/crimlaw/Cases&MaterialsonCriminalLawFourthEdition.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/crimlaw/CriminalLaw,Procedure,andEvidence.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/crimlaw/
legal-prose.org/../library/habeas/BOOK-federal-habeas-corpus-lyon.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/habeas/BOOK-state-habeas-corpus-relief.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/habeas/
legal-prose.org/../library/iac/
legal-prose.org/../library/appeals/
legal-prose.org/../library/mandamus-PDRs/
legal-prose.org/../library/civil/
legal-prose.org/../library/evidence/
legal-prose.org/../library/Constitutional/
legal-prose.org/../library/philosophy/
legal-prose.org/nav-pages/civ-toc
legal-prose.org/drafting-writing
legal-prose.org/../learning/contracts/c-practical-1-representations
legal-prose.org/../learning/contracts/c-practical-2-indemnity
legal-prose.org/../learning/contracts/c-practical-3-covenants
legal-prose.org/../learning/contracts/c-practical-4-breach
legal-prose.org/../learning/contracts/c-contract-theory
legal-prose.org/../library/contract/BOOK-contracts-Cases-Barnett-5th.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/contract/ContractLaw.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/contract/ContractLawForDummies.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/contract/ContractLawText,Cases,andMaterials.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/contract/OpinionWriting&DraftinginContractLaw.pdf
legal-prose.org/../learning/torts/t-assault-battery
legal-prose.org/../learning/torts/t-negligence-reckless
legal-prose.org/../library/torts/BOOK-Torts-Cases-Best-4th.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/torts/EssentialTortLaw,ThirdEdition.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/torts/TortLaw.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/torts/TortLawText,Cases,andMaterials.pdf
legal-prose.org/../library/civil/
Posted on

crimpro notes

 

criminal

  1. criminal procedure – investigation
    1. search chapter 1, 2 4th amendment

    criminal procedure – adjudication

    1. post conviction appealssufficiency of evdence, plain and structural error, motions, rules
    crimpro adjudication student paper

     

  2. criminal law – 1
    1. purpose chapter — —
    crimnlaw cases kaplan crimnlaw cases materials crimnlaw & evidence more

     

  3. habeas
    1. purpose chapter — —
    fed habeas state habeas papers in habeas papers ineffective IAC

     

  4. appeals
    1. ~ chapter — —
    pending mandamus pdrs civil litigation
  5. other
    1. ~ chapter — —
    evidence con law legal philosophy law
  • Chapter 1- Two Special Aspects of Constitutional Law
    1. What is Punishment: 1-I Smith v. Doe , Kansas v. Hendricks, Allen v. Illinois , ex post and double jeopardy issues
      1. Incorporation 1-IIA Duncan V. Louisiana, McDonald v. City of Chicago
      2. Retroactivity 1-IIB , ramos edwards Harlan Approach, Teague v. Lane, , The Teague Rule and Habeas, Lockhart v. Fretwell ,collateral review
  • Chapter 2. Searches and Seizures of Persons and Things
    1. intro 2-I border, citizenship limits: U.S. V. Verdugo-Urquidez (1990), Hernandez v. Mesa (2020)
    2. Threshold Requirements for Fourth Amendment Protections: What 2-II what is a search, Katz V. U.S.; Trespass Analysis Jones V. U.S.; privacy exceptions
    3. TheTension Between the Reasonableness and the Warrant Clauses 2-III, IV the warrant requirement, Johnson V. U.S., Spinelli V. U.S.
    4. Obtaining a Search Warrant: Constitutional Prerequisites
      1. Demonstrating Probable Cause
      2. Probable Cause, Specificity and Reasonableness 2-III, IV probable cause= Maryland v. Pringle, Florida v. Harris, , Andresen v. Maryland, United States v. Strand, Shadwick v. Tampa
    5. To Apply or Not Apply the Warrant Clause 193
      1. Arrests in Public and in the Home 2-V-1 United States v. Watson , Graham v. ConnorGerstein v. Pugh , Payton v. New York , Steagald v. United States , Minnesota v. Carter Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd
      2. Stop and Frisk
        1. terry v. ohio , 2-V when seizure? , leaving the car, PA V. MInns; passengers MD V. Wilson, home MI V. Summers, Mendenhall ‘free to leave’ test, bus sweeps, ‘ state of mind: Brower road block; not submitted: Hodari D.
        2. reasonable suspicion , Tips: Alabama v. White, Adams v. Williams, Florida v. JL; Quantum : United States v. Cortez; probabilities: United States v. Arvizu ; profiles: United States v. Berry, US V. Beck.
        3. limited searches and detnentions , Terry protective search: Adams V. Williams, not evidence Minnesota v. Dickerson 5, places Michigan v. Long ; limited dentionss Florida v. Royer, time limits United States v. Sharpe

        …

      3. Search Incident to Arrest: The Arrest Power Rule
      4. Pretextual Stops and Arrests
      5. Plain View and Plain Touch Seizures
      6. Automobiles and Other Movable Objects
      7. Exigent Circumstances
      8. Administrative Searches and Other Searches and Seizures
      9. Consent Searches(and Credibility)
    6. Electronic Surveillance, Undercover Activity, and the Outer Reaches
    7. Remedies for Fourth Amendment Violations exclusion remedies , Wolf v. Colorado , Mapp v. Ohio ; civil Hudson v. Michigan; exceptions: United States v. Leon, Messerschmidt v. Millender , Rakas v. Illinois, Brown v. Illinois, New York v. Harris, tone v. Powell; materality: US v. Campbell; suppression : Simmons v. United States, habeas: Stone v. Powell.
  • Chapter 3. Self-Incrimination and Confessions ……………………………… 64 7
      1. The Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination ………………………. 647
      2. Confessions and Due Process ………………………………………………………… 712
      3. Fifth Amendment Limitations on Confessions ………………………………… 732

    3-III-Miranda and exceptions habeas: Withrow v. Williams,, overruling Congress: Dickerson v. United States, , impeachment:L Harris v. New York,, 2 step Missouri v. Seibert, physical fruits: United States v. Patane,, public safety: New York v. Quarles,; defining custody, interrogations; ineffective assistane of counsel: Berghuis v. Thompkins , Knowles v. Mirzayance, requesting a lawyer: Edwards v. Arizona, Maryland v. Shatzer.

    1. Confessions and the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel .. ………………. 850

     

  • Chapter 4. Identifying Suspects ………………………………………………………. 883 Perry v. New Hampshire
    1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………. 883
    2. The Judicial Response …………………………………………………………………… 886

     

  • Chapter 5. The Right to Counsel. …………………………………………………….. 925 wex

================

adjudication: outline and notes

  1. Chapter 13- post conviction appeals and habeas
    1. sufficiency Ch. 13-1United States v. Lincoln, ,U.S. v. Ramirez, judgement of acquittal: United States v. Mariani,, Rule 29, Carlisle v. United States ; Rational Trier of Fact Test: Jackson v. Virginia; 2 layers: Habeas Review: Coleman v. Johnson and Parker v. Matthews; general verdicts: Griffin v. United States.
    2. rules and errors reversible?Abuse of Discretion, Reversible Error, Harmless Error, Plain Error, Structural Error, Rule 48. Dismissal, Rule 47. Motions and Supporting Affidavits, Rule 29. Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal, Rule 26.3 Mistrial, Rule 12. Pleadings and Pretrial Motions, Rule 16. Discovery and Inspection, Beyond Brady, suppression motions, civil failure to state a claim.
    3. standards for appellate review error?new trial, US V.Martinez, cited in US v. ama, Dist. Court; procedural abuuse of discretion, substantial evidence rule, mixed law fact, clearly erroneous findings of fact, law de novo, levels of scrutiny,; District Attorney’s Office v. Osborne, constiutional error Chapman v. California, and harmless? Sullivan v. Louisiana, and preservation United States v. Lane,, plain and harmless; United States v. Olano, United States v. Flores, and Apprendi; Preservation Rules,
    4. colletaral attack-fed habeas error?retroactivity US v. Reese , due process Harlan dissent Poe v. Ullman, , precluding coram nobis, Lowery v. US; 28 U.S. Code § 2241 – Power to grant writ, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Certificate of Appealability, waiver on appeal Reed v. Farley,, fundamental defect; late ripening claims, Panetti v. Quarterman, Schuster v. Espinoza, successive writs, Benchoff v. Colleran, quitable Gateways: Toward Expanded Federal Habeas Corpus Review of (2019); Martinez v. Ryan, IATC-IAC,Trevino v. Thaler,
    5. tx mandamus prison inmates error?TWO-PRONG STANDARD FOR MANDAMUS, Walker v. Packer, In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America, No Interlocutory criminal Ex parte Smith, fails eg In re Flanigan,ec.
    6. ex parte nailor- IATC and habeas error?defining ineffective assistance and maeraility

Posted on

legal drafting

Ejusdem Generis

Ejusdem generis is latin for “of the same kind.” When a law lists lists classes of persons or things, this concept is used to clarify such a list.

For example, if a law refers to automobiles, trucks, tractors, motorcycles, and other motor-powered vehicles, a court might use ejusdem generis to hold that such vehicles would not include airplanes, because the list included only land-based transportation.

Expressio unius

expressio unius est exclusio alterius n

[New Latin, the explicit mention of one (thing) is the exclusion of another]
: a principle in statutory construction: when one or more things of a class are expressly mentioned others of the same class are excluded